Adding Binary Search to Swift Collections

Swift is a great programming language. I’ve been working in Swift off and on for the past year or so, but with the release of v3.0 of the language, I’ve been spending a lot more time with it. I’m currently rewriting in Swift some of my older Objective-C iOS apps. Some of the code has not been touched since iOS 4/5 time-frame, which makes for some interesting reading.

In one of my projects, I have an array of samples taken over time, and the items in the array are ordered by an increasing timestamp value. Naturally, these samples are just appended to a Swift Array

var samples: [Sample] = []
var sample = Sample(Date())

In my app, I have a scatter plot which shows the samples, the horizontal (X) axis being time and the vertical (Y) axis showing the sampled value. As the user swipes the plot to see a different window of points, I wanted to adjust the bounds of the Y axis so that the points were optimally displayed in the available pixels. To do this, I needed to quickly locate two sample points in the data set, the first/last ones to appear in the view port. Between these two points I then locate the min/max value and update the Y axis bounds as appropriate.

A fast way to locate items in an ordered collection is to use binary search, which gives O(log N) performance [1]. This is a simple thing to do, though with Swift Collection indices there are some subtleties to abide by.

extension Collection {
    typealias OrderPredicate = (Iterator.Element, Iterator.Element) -> Bool
    func insertionIndexOf(value: Iterator.Element, predicate: OrderPredicate) -> Index {
        var low = startIndex
        var high = endIndex
        while low != high {
            let mid = index(low, offsetBy: distance(from: low, to: high) / 2)
            if predicate(self[mid], value) {
                low = index(mid, offsetBy: 1)
            else {
                high = mid
        return low

The new function insertionIndexOf locates the point in a collection to insert a given value such that the collection still remains sorted after the insertion takes place. Note that the function can return a position that is at the end of the collection – in other words, equal to the size of the collection – when all items in the collection are ordered before the value given to the function. The interesting bit about Collection indices is that they do not have to be integers. Thus, we cannot use normal math operations on them. Instead we need to use methods such as distance and index to generate new indices from old ones.

Collection Membership Checking

We can use the above insertionIndexOf method to provide a quick check whether a given value is held in a collection. All we need to do is make sure that the index returned from insertionIndexOf points to an element in the collection and that the value it points to matches the one that was given. Below is a definition for a function binarySearchFor which does just that, returning true if the given value was found in the collection.

extension Collection where Iterator.Element: Equatable {
    func binarySearchFor(value: Iterator.Element, predicate: OrderPredicate) -> Bool {
        let pos = insertionIndexOf(value: value, predicate: predicate)
        return pos < endIndex && self[pos] == value

Note that we cannot just add binarySearchFor to the Collection type like we did for insertionIndexOf because the binarySearchFor function requires the ability to test for equality between elements in the collection. Therefore, we must constrain the extension to only those collections that contains element types that implement the Equatable protocol.

MinMax on a Collection

Since we are having so much fun, here is a simple implementation of a minMax function for Collection types. One could easily calculate this by doing to iterations over the collection like so:

let minValue = samples.min()
let maxValue = samples.max()

However, we can do better by determining the min/max values in one pass. In the implementation below, minMax will return a 2-tuple containing the minimum and maximum values of a collection. If the collection is empty, then minMax will return nil. For non-empty collections, we take the first value as the min/max values and then we iterate over the rest of the elements and look for lesser/greater values.

extension Collection where Iterator.Element: Comparable {
    func minMax() -> (min: Iterator.Element, max: Iterator.Element)? {
        guard let value = first else { return nil }
        var min = value
        var max = value
        var pos = index(after: startIndex)
        while pos < endIndex {
            let value = self[pos]
            if value < min { min = value }
            if value > max { max = value }
            pos = index(after: pos)
        return (min: min, max: max)

Note that here we require (constrain) that the collection holds elements which implement the Comparable protocol so that we can determine if one value is greater than another.

  1. Actual performance depends on implementation of the index and distance methods. Types that support RandomAccessCollection protocol have O(1)* implementations for these methods. Since the Array type implements RandomAccessCollection, it will have true O(log N) binary search performance.